Review



ampar blocker  (Alomone Labs)


Bioz Verified Symbol Alomone Labs is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Alomone Labs manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Alomone Labs ampar blocker
    Ampar Blocker, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 80 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ampar blocker/product/Alomone Labs
    Average 95 stars, based on 80 article reviews
    ampar blocker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    Alomone Labs ampar blocker
    Ampar Blocker, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ampar blocker/product/Alomone Labs
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ampar blocker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Tocris ampar blocker nbqx
    Fig. 3 | BDNF regulates trafficking of <t>AMPAR</t> to the glioma postsynaptic membrane. a, Schematic depicting AMPAR trafficking downstream of BDNF– TrkB–CAMKII signalling46. b, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 5, 15 and 30 min. c, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 in b (n = 3 independent biological replicates). d, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA3 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 30 min. e, Quantification of cell surface GluA3 in d (n = 3 independent biological replicates). f, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI cells treated with NLGN3 for 30 min. g, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 data in f (n = 3 independent biological replicates). h, Schematic showing GluA2–SEP experiments. i,j, Validation of pHluorin approach. i, Left, representative images of a glioma cell process expressing GluA2(Q)–SEP, PSD95–RFP and whole-cell TagBFP in co-culture
    Ampar Blocker Nbqx, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ampar blocker nbqx/product/Tocris
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ampar blocker nbqx - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Adooq Bioscience LLC ampar blocker perampanel
    Fig. 3 | BDNF regulates trafficking of <t>AMPAR</t> to the glioma postsynaptic membrane. a, Schematic depicting AMPAR trafficking downstream of BDNF– TrkB–CAMKII signalling46. b, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 5, 15 and 30 min. c, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 in b (n = 3 independent biological replicates). d, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA3 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 30 min. e, Quantification of cell surface GluA3 in d (n = 3 independent biological replicates). f, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI cells treated with NLGN3 for 30 min. g, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 data in f (n = 3 independent biological replicates). h, Schematic showing GluA2–SEP experiments. i,j, Validation of pHluorin approach. i, Left, representative images of a glioma cell process expressing GluA2(Q)–SEP, PSD95–RFP and whole-cell TagBFP in co-culture
    Ampar Blocker Perampanel, supplied by Adooq Bioscience LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ampar blocker perampanel/product/Adooq Bioscience LLC
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ampar blocker perampanel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Tocris cnqx ampar blocker
    Fig. 3 | BDNF regulates trafficking of <t>AMPAR</t> to the glioma postsynaptic membrane. a, Schematic depicting AMPAR trafficking downstream of BDNF– TrkB–CAMKII signalling46. b, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 5, 15 and 30 min. c, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 in b (n = 3 independent biological replicates). d, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA3 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 30 min. e, Quantification of cell surface GluA3 in d (n = 3 independent biological replicates). f, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI cells treated with NLGN3 for 30 min. g, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 data in f (n = 3 independent biological replicates). h, Schematic showing GluA2–SEP experiments. i,j, Validation of pHluorin approach. i, Left, representative images of a glioma cell process expressing GluA2(Q)–SEP, PSD95–RFP and whole-cell TagBFP in co-culture
    Cnqx Ampar Blocker, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cnqx ampar blocker/product/Tocris
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cnqx ampar blocker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Tocris ampars blocker cnqx
    Fig. 3 | BDNF regulates trafficking of <t>AMPAR</t> to the glioma postsynaptic membrane. a, Schematic depicting AMPAR trafficking downstream of BDNF– TrkB–CAMKII signalling46. b, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 5, 15 and 30 min. c, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 in b (n = 3 independent biological replicates). d, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA3 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 30 min. e, Quantification of cell surface GluA3 in d (n = 3 independent biological replicates). f, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI cells treated with NLGN3 for 30 min. g, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 data in f (n = 3 independent biological replicates). h, Schematic showing GluA2–SEP experiments. i,j, Validation of pHluorin approach. i, Left, representative images of a glioma cell process expressing GluA2(Q)–SEP, PSD95–RFP and whole-cell TagBFP in co-culture
    Ampars Blocker Cnqx, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ampars blocker cnqx/product/Tocris
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ampars blocker cnqx - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology ampar channel blocker nbqx
    Increases in Short-Term Facilitation with Distance along a Dendrite Boost Distal Synaptic Integration (A) Whole-cell patch-clamp technique was used to record synaptic currents and fill CA1 pyramidal cells with a fluorescent dye to image its structure. Two stimulating pipettes were placed in the proximal (red) and distal (blue) extracellular domains of the basal dendritic tree of pyramidal cells to stimulate the local fibers. (B) Single cell example of average EPSC responses (average of 20 individual sweeps) to trains of 5 pulses at 20 Hz delivered to the proximal region (red trace) and the distal region (blue trace). The distal response shows greater facilitation compared to the proximal one. (C) Normalized average peak EPSC amplitudes for distal and proximal responses show greater sustained facilitation during a 5 pulse train (20 Hz) for distal synapses, n = 35 cells, multiple t tests with p values adjusted with the Holm-Sidak method, p < 0.05. (D) Paired-pulse ratios (PPRs) for each individual cell recorded at distal and proximal synapses. The majority (29/35) of cells display greater facilitation in the distal domain, n = 35 cells, p = 0.0003 two-tailed paired t test. (E) Distal increase in PPR is not ascribable to postsynaptic <t>AMPA</t> <t>receptor</t> desensitization (prevented by CTZ application) or to <t>AMPA</t> <t>receptor</t> saturation (avoided with γDGG application). Distal PPR is greater than proximal PPR with CTZ (n = 9 cells, p = 0.01), and γDGG (n = 13 cells, p < 0.01), two-tailed paired t test. Two-way ANOVA to test PPRs in control (D), CTZ, and γDGG conditions together shows no significant interaction, p = 0.84, indicating that the drugs have no effect on STP properties. (F) Full Synaptotagmin7 KO eliminates facilitation and proximo-distal STP differences. Triangles in lighter colors are from Syt7KO mice, n = 9 cells, circles in darker colors are littermate wild-type mice, n = 12 cells. For WT mice, proximal facilitation is lower than distal, multiple t tests, p < 0.05. WT facilitation is greater than Syt7KO facilitation, p < 0.01 multiple t tests. (G–I) Distal synaptic EPSCs take longer to reach the soma. (G) Left panel: normalized trace for a proximal and distal EPSC response showing the delayed kinetics of the distal compared to the proximal synaptic current. Right panel: the rise time constant of the EPSCs was significantly higher in distally triggered events, n = 49 cells, p < 0.001 Wilcoxon signed rank test. (H) Longer rise times correlate with the amount of facilitation, Spearman’s correlation. (I) PPR is higher when the stimulation electrode is placed further away from the soma, measured as distance along the dendrite, Spearman’s correlation. (J) Proximal synapses display greater P r than distal synapses. After MK-801 bath application, the normalized amplitude of EPSCs from proximally stimulated synapses decay faster, following successive stimulations, than distal ones; n = 8 cells. Data points were fit with a double exponential function (filled lines). Insets are example traces of 7 successive NMDA mediated EPSCs. (K) Frequency tuning curve showing PPRs for all frequencies tested. Distal PPRs (second stimulus only) increase significantly in the 20 Hz (n = 35) same as (D), and 50 Hz range (n = 20), p < 0.05, multiple t tests with Holm-Sidak adjusted p values. 5 Hz (n = 13 cells), 10 Hz (n = 16), 80 Hz (n = 9). (L–M) Short-term facilitation contributes to dendritic non-linear events in distal domains. (L) Current-clamp example traces (red proximal, blue distal stimulation) in response to a paired pulse, of increasing stimulus intensity (lighter color shades represent lower intensity). (M) The proportion of supra-linear events (at least 2 mV above the expected response) for distal synapses is greatly increased for the second pulse (P2) following facilitation at 20 Hz (0 events in P1, 8 events in P2, n = 10), while supra-linear events were detected to the first pulse (P1) for proximal stimulations (n = 10, 4 in P1, 5 in P2). At 5 Hz, where STP is absent, distal synapses had fewer supra-linear events (n = 5, 0 in P1, 2 in P2). See also and . Data are represented as mean ± SEM.
    Ampar Channel Blocker Nbqx, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ampar channel blocker nbqx/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ampar channel blocker nbqx - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Fig. 3 | BDNF regulates trafficking of AMPAR to the glioma postsynaptic membrane. a, Schematic depicting AMPAR trafficking downstream of BDNF– TrkB–CAMKII signalling46. b, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 5, 15 and 30 min. c, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 in b (n = 3 independent biological replicates). d, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA3 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 30 min. e, Quantification of cell surface GluA3 in d (n = 3 independent biological replicates). f, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI cells treated with NLGN3 for 30 min. g, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 data in f (n = 3 independent biological replicates). h, Schematic showing GluA2–SEP experiments. i,j, Validation of pHluorin approach. i, Left, representative images of a glioma cell process expressing GluA2(Q)–SEP, PSD95–RFP and whole-cell TagBFP in co-culture

    Journal: Nature

    Article Title: Glioma synapses recruit mechanisms of adaptive plasticity.

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06678-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3 | BDNF regulates trafficking of AMPAR to the glioma postsynaptic membrane. a, Schematic depicting AMPAR trafficking downstream of BDNF– TrkB–CAMKII signalling46. b, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 5, 15 and 30 min. c, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 in b (n = 3 independent biological replicates). d, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA3 in SU-DIPG-VI glioma with or without BDNF treatment for 30 min. e, Quantification of cell surface GluA3 in d (n = 3 independent biological replicates). f, Western blot analysis of cell surface and total cell protein levels of GluA4 in SU-DIPG-VI cells treated with NLGN3 for 30 min. g, Quantification of cell surface GluA4 data in f (n = 3 independent biological replicates). h, Schematic showing GluA2–SEP experiments. i,j, Validation of pHluorin approach. i, Left, representative images of a glioma cell process expressing GluA2(Q)–SEP, PSD95–RFP and whole-cell TagBFP in co-culture

    Article Snippet: For EdU proliferation assays, 70,000 wild-type or NTRK2-KO glioma cells were plated and incubated for 48 h, before treatment with EdU (10 μM) with or without the AMPAR blocker NBQX (10 μM, Tocris) and incubated for a further 24 h. Following incubation, the cultures were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min at room temperature and stained for immunofluorescence analysis.

    Techniques: Membrane, Western Blot, Biomarker Discovery, Expressing, Co-Culture Assay

    Increases in Short-Term Facilitation with Distance along a Dendrite Boost Distal Synaptic Integration (A) Whole-cell patch-clamp technique was used to record synaptic currents and fill CA1 pyramidal cells with a fluorescent dye to image its structure. Two stimulating pipettes were placed in the proximal (red) and distal (blue) extracellular domains of the basal dendritic tree of pyramidal cells to stimulate the local fibers. (B) Single cell example of average EPSC responses (average of 20 individual sweeps) to trains of 5 pulses at 20 Hz delivered to the proximal region (red trace) and the distal region (blue trace). The distal response shows greater facilitation compared to the proximal one. (C) Normalized average peak EPSC amplitudes for distal and proximal responses show greater sustained facilitation during a 5 pulse train (20 Hz) for distal synapses, n = 35 cells, multiple t tests with p values adjusted with the Holm-Sidak method, p < 0.05. (D) Paired-pulse ratios (PPRs) for each individual cell recorded at distal and proximal synapses. The majority (29/35) of cells display greater facilitation in the distal domain, n = 35 cells, p = 0.0003 two-tailed paired t test. (E) Distal increase in PPR is not ascribable to postsynaptic AMPA receptor desensitization (prevented by CTZ application) or to AMPA receptor saturation (avoided with γDGG application). Distal PPR is greater than proximal PPR with CTZ (n = 9 cells, p = 0.01), and γDGG (n = 13 cells, p < 0.01), two-tailed paired t test. Two-way ANOVA to test PPRs in control (D), CTZ, and γDGG conditions together shows no significant interaction, p = 0.84, indicating that the drugs have no effect on STP properties. (F) Full Synaptotagmin7 KO eliminates facilitation and proximo-distal STP differences. Triangles in lighter colors are from Syt7KO mice, n = 9 cells, circles in darker colors are littermate wild-type mice, n = 12 cells. For WT mice, proximal facilitation is lower than distal, multiple t tests, p < 0.05. WT facilitation is greater than Syt7KO facilitation, p < 0.01 multiple t tests. (G–I) Distal synaptic EPSCs take longer to reach the soma. (G) Left panel: normalized trace for a proximal and distal EPSC response showing the delayed kinetics of the distal compared to the proximal synaptic current. Right panel: the rise time constant of the EPSCs was significantly higher in distally triggered events, n = 49 cells, p < 0.001 Wilcoxon signed rank test. (H) Longer rise times correlate with the amount of facilitation, Spearman’s correlation. (I) PPR is higher when the stimulation electrode is placed further away from the soma, measured as distance along the dendrite, Spearman’s correlation. (J) Proximal synapses display greater P r than distal synapses. After MK-801 bath application, the normalized amplitude of EPSCs from proximally stimulated synapses decay faster, following successive stimulations, than distal ones; n = 8 cells. Data points were fit with a double exponential function (filled lines). Insets are example traces of 7 successive NMDA mediated EPSCs. (K) Frequency tuning curve showing PPRs for all frequencies tested. Distal PPRs (second stimulus only) increase significantly in the 20 Hz (n = 35) same as (D), and 50 Hz range (n = 20), p < 0.05, multiple t tests with Holm-Sidak adjusted p values. 5 Hz (n = 13 cells), 10 Hz (n = 16), 80 Hz (n = 9). (L–M) Short-term facilitation contributes to dendritic non-linear events in distal domains. (L) Current-clamp example traces (red proximal, blue distal stimulation) in response to a paired pulse, of increasing stimulus intensity (lighter color shades represent lower intensity). (M) The proportion of supra-linear events (at least 2 mV above the expected response) for distal synapses is greatly increased for the second pulse (P2) following facilitation at 20 Hz (0 events in P1, 8 events in P2, n = 10), while supra-linear events were detected to the first pulse (P1) for proximal stimulations (n = 10, 4 in P1, 5 in P2). At 5 Hz, where STP is absent, distal synapses had fewer supra-linear events (n = 5, 0 in P1, 2 in P2). See also and . Data are represented as mean ± SEM.

    Journal: Neuron

    Article Title: A Distance-Dependent Distribution of Presynaptic Boutons Tunes Frequency-Dependent Dendritic Integration

    doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.015

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Increases in Short-Term Facilitation with Distance along a Dendrite Boost Distal Synaptic Integration (A) Whole-cell patch-clamp technique was used to record synaptic currents and fill CA1 pyramidal cells with a fluorescent dye to image its structure. Two stimulating pipettes were placed in the proximal (red) and distal (blue) extracellular domains of the basal dendritic tree of pyramidal cells to stimulate the local fibers. (B) Single cell example of average EPSC responses (average of 20 individual sweeps) to trains of 5 pulses at 20 Hz delivered to the proximal region (red trace) and the distal region (blue trace). The distal response shows greater facilitation compared to the proximal one. (C) Normalized average peak EPSC amplitudes for distal and proximal responses show greater sustained facilitation during a 5 pulse train (20 Hz) for distal synapses, n = 35 cells, multiple t tests with p values adjusted with the Holm-Sidak method, p < 0.05. (D) Paired-pulse ratios (PPRs) for each individual cell recorded at distal and proximal synapses. The majority (29/35) of cells display greater facilitation in the distal domain, n = 35 cells, p = 0.0003 two-tailed paired t test. (E) Distal increase in PPR is not ascribable to postsynaptic AMPA receptor desensitization (prevented by CTZ application) or to AMPA receptor saturation (avoided with γDGG application). Distal PPR is greater than proximal PPR with CTZ (n = 9 cells, p = 0.01), and γDGG (n = 13 cells, p < 0.01), two-tailed paired t test. Two-way ANOVA to test PPRs in control (D), CTZ, and γDGG conditions together shows no significant interaction, p = 0.84, indicating that the drugs have no effect on STP properties. (F) Full Synaptotagmin7 KO eliminates facilitation and proximo-distal STP differences. Triangles in lighter colors are from Syt7KO mice, n = 9 cells, circles in darker colors are littermate wild-type mice, n = 12 cells. For WT mice, proximal facilitation is lower than distal, multiple t tests, p < 0.05. WT facilitation is greater than Syt7KO facilitation, p < 0.01 multiple t tests. (G–I) Distal synaptic EPSCs take longer to reach the soma. (G) Left panel: normalized trace for a proximal and distal EPSC response showing the delayed kinetics of the distal compared to the proximal synaptic current. Right panel: the rise time constant of the EPSCs was significantly higher in distally triggered events, n = 49 cells, p < 0.001 Wilcoxon signed rank test. (H) Longer rise times correlate with the amount of facilitation, Spearman’s correlation. (I) PPR is higher when the stimulation electrode is placed further away from the soma, measured as distance along the dendrite, Spearman’s correlation. (J) Proximal synapses display greater P r than distal synapses. After MK-801 bath application, the normalized amplitude of EPSCs from proximally stimulated synapses decay faster, following successive stimulations, than distal ones; n = 8 cells. Data points were fit with a double exponential function (filled lines). Insets are example traces of 7 successive NMDA mediated EPSCs. (K) Frequency tuning curve showing PPRs for all frequencies tested. Distal PPRs (second stimulus only) increase significantly in the 20 Hz (n = 35) same as (D), and 50 Hz range (n = 20), p < 0.05, multiple t tests with Holm-Sidak adjusted p values. 5 Hz (n = 13 cells), 10 Hz (n = 16), 80 Hz (n = 9). (L–M) Short-term facilitation contributes to dendritic non-linear events in distal domains. (L) Current-clamp example traces (red proximal, blue distal stimulation) in response to a paired pulse, of increasing stimulus intensity (lighter color shades represent lower intensity). (M) The proportion of supra-linear events (at least 2 mV above the expected response) for distal synapses is greatly increased for the second pulse (P2) following facilitation at 20 Hz (0 events in P1, 8 events in P2, n = 10), while supra-linear events were detected to the first pulse (P1) for proximal stimulations (n = 10, 4 in P1, 5 in P2). At 5 Hz, where STP is absent, distal synapses had fewer supra-linear events (n = 5, 0 in P1, 2 in P2). See also and . Data are represented as mean ± SEM.

    Article Snippet: For the NMDAR depletion experiments the extracellular solution contained the AMPAR channel blocker NBQX 10 μM (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) instead of AP-5.

    Techniques: Patch Clamp, Two Tailed Test, Control

    Journal: Neuron

    Article Title: A Distance-Dependent Distribution of Presynaptic Boutons Tunes Frequency-Dependent Dendritic Integration

    doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.015

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: For the NMDAR depletion experiments the extracellular solution contained the AMPAR channel blocker NBQX 10 μM (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) instead of AP-5.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Software